ANTIGUAN PRESS CONFERENCE ON U.S. SITUATION SOON
(626) (7-October-2006)
Major online gambling companies and Antiguan licensing authority
to speak Monday on US legislative action
Earlier reports that top online gambling executives were visiting the
Caribbean licensing jurisdiction of Antigua this week (see earlier InfoPowa
bulletins) assumed more significance Friday with the announcement that
the government plans a major press conference on Monday October 9.
Antigua's director of gaming, Kaye MacDonald , says the government hopes
to show that recent American legislation contradicts the World Trade
Organisation ruling against the United States in regards to online gaming.
Officials will attempt to explain in detail the inconsistency and inapplicability
of the proposed Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act , which is
currently before the US President for signing into law.
A number of leading e-gaming operators and legal experts are reported to be
traveling to Antigua and Barbuda to help organise and formulate their support
for the Antiguan initiative to highlight the worsening conflict with World
Trade Organisation rulings created by the latest American political moves.
For several years the islanders have been at the forefront of a fierce
WTO struggle with the United States over its alleged discriminatory actions
against online gambling. Kaye MacDonald, director of gaming for Antigua
and Barbuda, will head proceedings to explain how the new US law contravenes
2005 World Trade Organisation rulings against the US and is blatantly
protectionist against non-US operators.
Industry observers postulate that the hope is that the high profile
conference will persuade President Bush to hold on signing the highly
contentious bill into law. The President has until Friday the 13 October
to sign the bill off or use his power of veto.
The anti-online gambling measure, sponsored by Republican senators Frist
and Kyl, was tacked on to a totally unrelated but vital ports security
bill last Friday, with thirty minutes notice which meant that most congressional
representatives had little idea of its potential. In a high-pressure
late night move to get the port security bill through before Congress
recessed for the mid-term elections, politicians were asked to vote on
the bill and its attachment in the early hours of Saturday morning. The
bill passed and was immediately approved on a voice vote in the Senate.
There has been considerable indignation throughout the industry at what
is seen as the underhanded manner of the attachment's submission, which
relied more on political manouevreing than the usual democratic process. |